Jump to: navigation, search

Article:Maintenance of Common Property in Sectional Title Schemes - Response

Maintenance Common Property.png

Maintenance of Common Property

I refer to the article by Brian Agar ‘Maintenance of common property in sectional title schemes’ 2018 (Oct) DR 19. I must firstly agree with Mr Agar that there is much to be criticised about the new sectional title legislation. My first and most important criticism is the extent to which the administration of sectional title schemes has unnecessarily been rendered more complicated and difficult, particularly by the prescribed management rulesin relation to a building which is divided into sections and common property, means the management rules and conduct rules referred to in section 10(2)(a) and (b), respectively;.

However, I must disagree with some very important aspects of Mr Agar’s views expressed in the article. Let me start with the most important one, namely the question as to which schemes the currently prescribed rulesin relation to a building which is divided into sections and common property, means the management rules and conduct rules referred to in section 10(2)(a) and (b), respectively; apply. Mr Agar states that ‘while schemes registered after 7 October 2016 must observe the Act and its Regulations, schemes registered under the Sectional Titles Act 95 of 1986 retain most of their Management Rules and these do not require a maintenance plan.’ This view is based on s 10(12) of the Sectional Titles Schemes Management Act 8 of 2011 (the Act), which reads as follows:

‘Any rulesin relation to a building which is divided into sections and common property, means the management rules and conduct rules referred to in section 10(2)(a) and (b), respectively; made under the Sectional Titles Actmeans the Sectional Titles Act, 1986 (Act No. 95 of 1986), as amended; are deemed to have been made under this Act.’

I must agree that this bland statement can be interpreted in different ways. However, the ruling interpretation as applied by trustees, managing agents, practitioners, academics, as well as the Community Schemes Ombud Service is that the word ‘made’ should be understood to mean amended rulesin relation to a building which is divided into sections and common property, means the management rules and conduct rules referred to in section 10(2)(a) and (b), respectively; adopted by respective bodies corporate and not rulesin relation to a building which is divided into sections and common property, means the management rules and conduct rules referred to in section 10(2)(a) and (b), respectively; ‘made’ by the legislature.

The latter interpretation is supported by the transitional clause, s 21 of the Act, which reads as follows:

Rules prescribed under the Sectional Titles Actmeans the Sectional Titles Act, 1986 (Act No. 95 of 1986), as amended; must continue to apply to new and existing schemes until the Minister has made regulations prescribing management rulesin relation to a building which is divided into sections and common property, means the management rules and conduct rules referred to in section 10(2)(a) and (b), respectively; and conduct rulesin relation to a building which is divided into sections and common property, means the management rules and conduct rules referred to in section 10(2)(a) and (b), respectively; referred to in section 10(2) of this Act.’

The minister prescribed the new rulesin relation to a building which is divided into sections and common property, means the management rules and conduct rules referred to in section 10(2)(a) and (b), respectively; on 7 October 2016, at which point, the ‘old’ prescribed rulesin relation to a building which is divided into sections and common property, means the management rules and conduct rules referred to in section 10(2)(a) and (b), respectively; lapsed and the new rulesin relation to a building which is divided into sections and common property, means the management rules and conduct rules referred to in section 10(2)(a) and (b), respectively; became applicable to all schemes, old and new,, except in respect of special rulesin relation to a building which is divided into sections and common property, means the management rules and conduct rules referred to in section 10(2)(a) and (b), respectively; ‘made’ by the bodies corporate prior to that date, which special rulesin relation to a building which is divided into sections and common property, means the management rules and conduct rules referred to in section 10(2)(a) and (b), respectively; are retained. The latter exception is subject to a proviso that such special management rulesin relation to a building which is divided into sections and common property, means the management rules and conduct rules referred to in section 10(2)(a) and (b), respectively; may not be irreconcilable with any prescribed management rule.

In general, it should, therefore, be understood that the rulesin relation to a building which is divided into sections and common property, means the management rules and conduct rules referred to in section 10(2)(a) and (b), respectively; prescribed under the Act apply to all sectional title schemes and that the requirements for a maintenance plan apply similarly to all schemes.

Mr Agar then finds a contradiction between formulas prescribed under management r 22(2) and reg 2. What should be understood is that management r 22(2) prescribes the formula, which must be applied, and the result should then be tested against the three minima prescribed under reg 2. These two provisions do not contradict each other.

The next point that warrants comment is the statement that ‘the proposed annual contributions to the reserve fund are voted on by owners at the AGM.’ This is not true. The owners vote on the budget only. Although this does ultimately result in determination of the levies, it is not the same as voting on the levies, which owners may not do. Should the owners adopt an inadequate budget, it will eventually unavoidably lead to the imposition of special levies by the trustees, about which the owners have no say.

I agree with Mr Agar that the preparation, adoption and upkeep of a maintenance plan is onerous and may be costly. However, the introduction of such a system has become unavoidable due to trustees and managing agents continuing to fund maintenance projects with special levies under the previous regime, despite many warnings, myself included.

No legislation is ever perfect, and this applies particularly to sectional title legislation. The concept of sectional titles was first developed for blocks of flats and the laws were framed accordingly. However, the concept very quickly washed over to other property formats, such as free-standing houses, shops and offices, mixed residential/commercial schemes, hospitals, caravan parks and even boat moorings. Soon it is likely also to apply to farmland. Each of these demand different legislative formats and to create a single law catering for all possibilities is very difficult and demands constant legislative adaptations.

New sets of problems arise constantly, and the legislature must provide solutions. Two examples are the building'''STSMAct'''-means a structure of a permanent nature erected or to be erected and which is shown on a sectional plan as part of a scheme. '''BSAct'''-includes- (a) ''any other structure, whether of a temporary or permanent nature and irrespective of the materials used'' in the erection thereof, erected or used for or in connection with- (i) the accommodation or convenience of human beings or animals; (ii) the manufacture, processing, storage, display or sale of any goods; (iii) the rendering of any service; (iv) the destruction or treatment of refuse or other waste materials; (v) the cultivation or growing of any plant or crop; (b) any wall, swimming bath, swimming pool, reservoir or bridge or any other structure connected therewith; (c) any fuel pump or any tank used in connection therewith; (d) any part of a building, including a building as defined in paragraph (a), (b) or (c); (e) any facilities or system, or part or portion thereof, within or outside but incidental to a building, for the provision of a water supply, drainage, sewerage, stormwater disposal, electricity supply or other similar service in respect of the building; of mezzanine floors, which extend the floor areas of sections, doors and windows not fitted on the median lines of walls. Both required legislative amendments.

I cannot agree with Mr Agar that the issue of doors and windows have not been clearly resolved. The amendment referred to by him was that the median lines of external walls deviate to the median lines of doors and windows fitted in such walls. This means that the external halves of such features are common property, in relation to a scheme, means— (a) the land included in the scheme; (b) such parts of the building or buildings as are not included in a section; and (c) land referred to in section 5(1)(d);, while the inner halves are private property. The accepted practice is that, as far as maintenance and replacement is concerned, the costs in respect of such features are split 50/50 between owner'''STSMAct'''-in relation to a unit or a section or an undivided share in the common property forming part of such unit, means, subject to subsection (5), the person in whose name the unit is registered at a deeds registry in terms of the Sectional Titles Act or in whom ownership is vested by statute, including the trustee in an insolvent estate, the liquidator of a company or close corporation which is an owner, the executor of an owner who has died, or the representative of an owner, who is a minor or of unsound mind, recognised by law, and ‘‘owned’’ and ‘‘ownership’’ have a corresponding meaning; and body corporatein relation to a building and the land in a sectional title scheme, means the body corporate of that building referred to in section 2(1);. Mr Agar describes the amendment as ‘half-baked.’ Although not perfect, I would challenge him to draft something better.

See also ‘Response to ‘‘maintenance of common property, in relation to a scheme, means— (a) the land included in the scheme; (b) such parts of the building or buildings as are not included in a section; and (c) land referred to in section 5(1)(d); in sectional title schemes’’’ 2019 (JanFeb) DR 4. Tertius Maree BA Law LLB LLM (Stell) is an attorney at Tertius Maree Associates in Stellenbosch. See Also:

This article was first published in De Rebus in 2019 (JanFeb) DR 20.